Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from queue1-svc.ntlworld.com (queue1-win.server.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.221]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0H5F1mK005519 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:15:04 -0800 Received: from EozVul.WORKGROUP ([217.137.144.106]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040116164705.UNDH22499.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@EozVul.WORKGROUP>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:47:05 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:47:00 +0000 From: DaMouse Networks To: Francois Romieu Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [patch] 2.6.1-bk1-netdev4 - latent bug Message-Id: <20040116164700.4670ca1b@EozVul.WORKGROUP> In-Reply-To: <20040115090731.B13143@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20040114233350.A4646@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20040115003319.B4646@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20040115071314.0141e55c@EozVul.WORKGROUP> <20040115090731.B13143@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> X-archive-position: 2564 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: damouse@ntlworld.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 1334 Lines: 38 Organization: DaMouse Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit SMP-Enabled Kernel, i was pinging my router (Win2k Server) which seems to be pretty good at withstanding ping -f :) and I went downstairs and checked it was still alive after I lost contact, hey netdev peeps and peepesses, my computer is still alive and glowing blue :P -DaMouse On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:07:31 +0100 Francois Romieu wrote: > DaMouse Networks : > [...] > > --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- > > 29918 packets transmitted, 16354 received, 45% packet loss, time 290162ms > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.379/0.398/10.352/0.181 ms, ipg/ewma 9.698/0.389 ms > > Btw, you can/may lower the packet size during ping (see -s option). > > [...] > > Then I try again and I get this: > > > > PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > > >From 192.168.0.94 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable > > Ok, I'll dig that. It does not seem _too_ bad. > - is your modem able to stand a ping -f without loss ? > - were you running an smp-enabled kernel ? > - can you Cc: netdev so people know that your computer survived ? > > Thanks for the quick feedback. > > -- > Ueimor